The Omnivore’s Dilemma
The Omnivore’s Dilemma is simply the question: “what do we eat?”
Michael Pollan takes the question very literally, asking exactly what we are putting in our mouths and where it came from, so this is necessarily a book about agriculture, about ways of coaxing usable nutrition from our environment. He organizes his study around four ways of doing this – industrial agriculture and production, industrial production of organic food, artisanal, ecologically sound production, and finally non-production, the hunting and gathering of your own food.
Along the way, he explains why we can calculate exactly how much corn is in our diet, describes the emotional experience of slaughtering chickens, and embarks on one of the most thorough discussions of the ethics of carnivorous behaviour that I’ve ever read. Pollan’s book is consistently well written, often revelatory, and always thought provoking.
I want to say that The Omnivore’s Dilemma is, in addition to all this, a transparent, even-handed piece of investigative journalism, yet some of the conclusions the book drives you to are so stark and unavoidable that you find yourself wondering if things are this close to black and white. Pollan’s sympathies are abundantly clear, but even after you take them out of the equation, the picture he paints doesn’t have much grey in it – the sense that Pollan himself didn’t know what he was getting into is palpable, and, what sells his view is the sense that he is formulating it as he writes.
As Diana pointed out, this kind of writing is becoming a genre – industrial food versus responsible food, McDonalds versus Ms. Waters. To misquote Pollan himself, this is Good Food Pastoral, a genre which could only have arisen because the target is so damn big and, much though I detest it, because the food network is so damn popular. Nonetheless, this book stands out for its personal inflection and determined clarity.
This is an invitation to consider, deeply, not merely what to eat, but how we choose what we eat. Should “what’s for lunch?” be a question of moral philosophy?
I don’t even want to touch that question, and Pollan doesn’t either – nonetheless, it saturates the book, just beneath the surface. What The Omnivore’s Dilemma does, admirably, is to ask us to take a long hard look at the true cost of our food. If you eat, you should read this book.
Spring means tastiness on the porch – burgers and fiddleheads and Dogfish Head ale.
We got our meat from McKinnon’s. They buy in sides and butcher in house, but most of their meat is sold precut, in clingfilm and Styrofoam, though they’ll take orders for special cuts. Their meat is heavily marbled and very red. They’ve never even heard of organic. Atop the burgers sat radish greens, chopped and sautéed with garlic (why more burger joints don’t do the sautéed greens burger, we’ll never know). The radishes came from Pemberton Farms’ organic shelf, but the staff couldn’t tell me where they came from. Fiddleheads were also from Pemberton – blanched and dressed with oil and salt. Foraged rather than farmed, and definitely from New England. We slathered French mustard on English muffins, and drank ale from Delaware.
We sat and talked, and the meal was no less blissful for the fact that most of the food had traveled miles and miles to reach us. It’s an odd blessing, this disconnect between the crisp pleasure of the meal and the knowledge of where things likely came from, of how much they cost.